Received: JanuAccepted: Published: July 11, 2018Ĭopyright: © 2018 Chen et al. PLoS ONE 13(7):Įditor: Wolfgang Glanzel, KU Leuven, BELGIUM We discuss the implications of using metrics derived from these platforms as impact indicators.Ĭitation: Chen P-Y, Hayes E, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR (2018) Social reference managers and their users: A survey of demographics and ideologies.
Zotero users are more likely to use the platform’s search functions and to organize their libraries, while Mendeley users are more likely to take advantage of some of the discovery and networking features-such as browsing papers and groups and connecting with other users. Results show strong differences between platforms: Mendeley users are younger and more gender-balanced Zotero users are more engaged in social media and more likely to come from the social sciences and humanities. The survey examines demographic characteristics, usage of the platforms, as well as attitudes towards key issues in scholarly communication, such as open access, peer review, privacy, and the reward system of science.
The present work uses a large-scale survey to study the users of two prominent social reference managers-Mendeley and Zotero. However, little work has been done to understand the data underlying this indicator. Among this ecosystem of heterogeneous indicators, social reference managers have been proposed as indicators of broader use of scholarly work. Altmetric indicators are increasingly present in the research landscape.
0 kommentar(er)
